Legal Aspects Of Criminal Justice

In this situation , should the motion to suppress be apt(p) ? contend the legality or illegality of the officer s behaviorIn analyzing these facts , it is important to scratch ascertain the implications of the Miranda Rights . Widely popularized in modern day police shows and movies , the Miranda Rights has gained a popularity that may even surpass that of the correlative implicit in(p) rights on the freedom of speech , press and assembly (Stevenson 1982 . This belief which was first lain down in the effect of Miranda v genus Arizona wherein Ernesto Miranda , who was accuse of kidnapping and rape , was convicted on the basis of his acknowledgment that was solicited from him during the protecting(prenominal) probe without the benefit of having an attorney present (Weiss 2005 . The provided evidence produced by the pro secution during his trial was his confession . The sting together States compulsive Court ruled in this case that c tot everyyable to the pressures that be exerted by the authorities during these tutelary investigatings the confession was crooked (Weiss 2005 . It was not shown by the prosecution that the confession was made freely and voluntarily , which is the essence of all extra-judicial confessionsThe main theory in this case and in the adoption of the Miranda Rights is that one cannot be compelled to incriminate himself no matter what the situation . The practice of pressuring suspects into owning up to a evil is a danger that must be averted . at that practice is no higher right than that of human dignity which carries with it the unsusceptibility of being innocent until proven guilty and the right against self-incrimination (Weiss 2005The Miranda Rights as known today is a police warning that is issued to all suspects who are in police fetter under custodial investigation or who are under police chain! s in either manner as to restrict their liberties and freedoms (Weiss 2005 .

The command requires that the police or whatever authority has the right to motion the suspect first inform the suspect of his right to be silent , to his counsel of choice and to his right to waive either of his rights with the assistance of counsel . Once a suspect has been specialise down and hesitationed for the purposed of eliciting culture for the crime of which he or she is punt of committing , it is imperative that the Miranda Rights be respected or else all information or evidence obtained will be inadmissible in any court that will try his or her naturalness (Weiss 2005In this case , it is clear from the facts that John Doe was not hypothecate his rights . The law is clear when it requires that everyone who is arrested or taken into custodial investigation , such as the situation John Doe is in , must be informed of their Miranda Rights . There is no doubt that the act of the police officer in conducting the investigation without the motility man of a lawyer and without informing the accused of his rights is in plow violation of the ConstitutionWhile it may certainly be...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper